Case Summary Golden Bear International in Mexico Essay Example

Case Summary Golden Bear International in Mexico Essay Example Case Summary Golden Bear International in Mexico Paper Case Summary Golden Bear International in Mexico Paper Golden Bear intended to carry out a long term vertical integration which included arming Joint ventures with international partners to own and operate Jack Nicolas Signature Golf Courses worldwide that rather than Just selling consulting services. Besides Golden Bear International, Group Skis project also depended on GET data site. For the desirability as a vacation resort, the location proposed for the project located less than 50 miles south of Mexico City, and immediately northwest of the main pueblo of the municipality of Deponent. The corporate partner for the proposed El Deportee project included Group KS, he main development and investment partner, GET Data Systems and Golden Bear International. Group KS was backed by prominent Mexican business people and by state and federal PRI politicians in Occurrence and Mexico City. The role of Golden Bear International Is Important for two reasons: the prestige attributed to Nicolas courses would attract residential and recreational facilities; the location of the course that Golden Bear design was expert environmentally friendly course. The project received strong state government support and local support. Mom Vernon viewed the project as a potential development pole for the state, some viewed it as a model of environmentally sustainable development. The government regarded the project as important attract to foreign business to Mexico. In addition, the project also needed local government support with municipal approval to rezone some of the 900 acres from agricult ural use to use for residential and tourism purposes. From the local community side, the project was viewed as a gift from heaven for the people of Deponent with positive impact on community of Deponent. Group KS claimed that the completed project would generate $1 1 9,000 in annual municipal property taxes, which would have allowed Deponent to overhaul Its obsolete and falling water and wastewater Infrastructure. However, the project was received the local opposition and suspicion as well. It release ten Issues sun as economic Issues, Lana Issues, environmental Ana cultural issues. The main concerned about the economic issues was that some argued that the Jobs that project offered were generally not suitable or desirable for the Deportee community. Since the largest populations of the local were high school graduates, it was believed that most of the Jobs would be menial laborer or housekeeper type positions. The local opposition was couched in terms of a lack of respect for the right of the community. They claimed that such Jobs would neither provide for a sustainable economy nor suitable employ the well-educated young people in the town. Referred to the environmental issues, opponents argued that the golf course would use at least half of the towns limited water supply to water the Renee as the course would be located at the confluence of the three aquifers upstream from Depopulate. The cultural issues for the project were the informal community leadership in Depopulate and local autonomy. Informal community leadership was based on the eight barrio festivals through a martyrdom system. The importance of such festivals cannot be underestimated for providing distinction between Deportees and the rest of the world. Another cultural issue referred to local autonomy in terms of an almost sacred autonomy versus outside imposition. This autonomy was about the aerodrome system because it required long-term residents born in Depopulate but not temporary visitors. At the last, since the project attracted many Deportees in the satellite community, it was viewed as an inappropriate form of development for their community. Positions and gardeners were not helpful for agricultural workers and small-scale farmers. Moreover, Nags such as Greengrocer influenced the local oppositions thinking and ways to fight the developers for providing external political support and scientific studies about the environmental influences of golf courses.